Hi Jack,

Great feedback on the RFP Accelerator demo. We went through all six items and everything is updated and tested. Here's what changed:

1. PDF Upload Fix
You flagged that dragging a redacted PDF into the browser opened it in a new tab instead of uploading it. We added drag-and-drop support directly on the upload area. You can now drop files anywhere on the input section and they route straight into the analysis pipeline. Single file drops go to single-doc analysis, multiple files go to package analysis. The file picker button still works too.

2. Classification and Verification Legends
The Class and Verify columns in the risk heat map now have a legend directly above the table explaining what each code means:

We also added a trust threshold guidance note explaining the 70% evidence coverage floor and what it means when the engine refuses to ground a requirement.

3. Walkthrough Recommendations and Terminology
The walkthrough now shows amber-highlighted recommendation tags on every REFUSED item with specific guidance on what to do (go back to the solicitation source, contact the contracting officer for clarification, etc.). We also replaced "defense contracting" with "Aerospace & Defense" across all materials and changed "3-5 days" to "many days" since the actual timeline varies by solicitation complexity.

4. Output Documents Visual
The multi-document walkthrough now includes an 8-card grid showing exactly what comes back from a package analysis: Compliance Matrix, Requirements Traceability Matrix, Risk Register, Executive Summary, ROM Estimate, Cross-Document Conflict Report, CDRL Coverage Map and Evaluation Factor Analysis.

5. One-Pager Restructured as Sales Hook
The one-pager has been completely rewritten. Instead of listing all 18 modules, it now leads with the problem every proposal team knows, shows three value propositions and includes a side-by-side comparison against LLM-based competitors. The CTA points to the multi-document demo so prospects can see it in action.

6. Capability Coverage (formerly "Honest Capability Map")
We renamed the section to "Capability Coverage" and simplified the status language. You mentioned wanting to discuss whether this section helps or hurts the sale. We'd love to get your take on that in our next conversation. The content is the same but the framing is more neutral now.

All changes are tested (1,761 automated tests across 51 suites, all passing) and the deploy package is ready. Happy to walk through any of this live whenever works for you.

Best,
Jordannah